Sonia Sotomayor: Second Amendment Doesn’t Apply To Individuals
Email This Post
Supreme court nominee Sonia Sotomayor is giving conservatives plenty of fodder for battling her confirmation. In addition to declaring that the courts are where policy is made, and the racist statement that a “wise Latina” such as herself would make better decisions than white males,” she is no fan of the Second Amendment.
Sotomayor’s Princeton University legal theses included “Race in the American Classroom, and Undying Injustice: American ‘Exceptionalism’ and Permanent Bigotry”, and “Deadly Obsession: American Gun Culture.” In the second thesis, Sotomayor argued that the Second Amendment did not actually afford individual citizens the right to bear arms, but only duly conferred organizations, like the military. Instead of making guns illegal, she says that they have been illegal for individuals to own since the passing of the Bill of Rights. WHAAAT?
This chick is Eric Holder’s wet dream, and kills about 4 birds with one stone for Obama. Minority? Check. Female? Check. Liberal? Check. Gay? Rumored to be a check. Her colleagues have painted her as a “terror on the bench”, “aggressive and combative” and unable to be a consensus builder. Her judicial record may be long, but 65% of her rulings have thankfully been overturned. Is she racist? She is on the board of La Raza, the Hispanic activist group that wants Texas and California back, promotes driver’s licenses for illegal aliens, amnesty programs, and wants no immigration law enforcement by local and state police… amongst MANY other demands. La Raza means “The Race.” It’s not YOUR race unless you’re Hispanic, and if you aren’t Hispanic, La Raza is not fond of you.
Sotomayor may have grown up in a Bronx trashcan with Oscar The Grouch, and fought her way to the top of the heap, but these are not qualifications for a lifetime on the Supreme Court. The White House has warned Sotomayor’s critics to “be very careful.”
Related Posts on Right Soup:
- Sotomayor Hearings Begin This Morning
- Sonia Sotomayor Is Obama’s Pick For Supreme Court: Court Would Hang A Hard Left
- Sotomayor Plays Softball
- Right Sightings
- Obama Doesn’t Let Ft. Hood Tragedy Get In The Way Of Political Pandering
- Slaughtered.
- Michele Bachmann Calls For Investigation Of Obama Judicial Appointment
- Right Sightings
- Michael Savage: Turn Tea Party Into “Impeach Obama” Party
- John Brennan Panders To “Flying Imam” Ringleader
- Why Underwater Loans Are NOT Being Negotiated
- Right Sightings
- National Tea Party Convention: Breitbart Spanks The Media!
- Too Late To Apologize: A Declaration
- It’s Not Civil To Question Obama’s Citizenship












May 30th, 2009 at 2:16 am
How can anyone that has lived in Texas Or California not realize that this woman is a racist, i was raised in Cali 60 -70S and now reside in Texas. i know for fact just being a child in cali and having to fight my way into school and fight my way out every single day, La Raza are very violent females, they hate white people to the max and this women is a board member, it is amazing what democrats will do to buy votes, God help us
July 15th, 2009 at 11:01 pm
This woman is a legal lightweight when it comes to the 2nd Amendment. She is trying desperately to make all the right noises about legal philosophy but a quick review of her opinions show she has no intention of making unbiased decisions in that arena. I fully expect the same to be true in the racist sector. How could a member of La Raza be unprejudiced?? This woman is a danger to our Constitution; I can see no way she can render impartial decisions based only on law. Absolutely a NO vote!!