Insider Trading: Illegal For You, But Not For Congress! – H.R. 682
Email This Post
“Insider trading”… buying or selling securities based on knowledge that hasn’t been publicly disclosed is a felony. It’s prohibition is one of the basics of securities regulation and law. Imagine if you knew for a fact that a company’s earnings report was going to be better than expected- you could buy the stock before earnings were reported, and make a pile of cash after the good news was announced. You would also be cheating the rest of the public to whom the information had not been disclosed.
Lots of you know my background on Wall Street; 2 decades as an investment portfolio manager. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) required us to disclose EVERY securities trade we made on our own behalf, to ensure we were not violating any securities regulations- especially “insider trading.” These regulations are very strictly enforced… and the SEC was, and is, vigilant in prosecuting violators. Just ask Martha Stewart.
One special group, however, gets to skirt these regulations. I was outraged to find that a dangerous legal loophole exists; one which allows members of Congress and high-powered executive-branch appointees to exploit “insider” knowledge of publicly traded companies, in order to make personal profits.
Under current law, Congress and staff who have access to the privileged “non-public information” gathered through official oversight proceedings, are NOT prohibited from using that information for personal benefit in securities and commodities trading. The SEC does not have the authority to hold employees of Congress, or the Executive Branch, liable for using insider information gained from official proceedings for insider trading. Equally as abhorrent: there are lobbyists and traders who haunt the halls of Congress seeking insider tips from staff, and are known as “political intelligence consultants.” They may also enrich themselves and their clients using this confidential information.
“Insider trading” is HIGHLY illegal for you, me and every other person who trades in the securities markets. Why is it legal for government officials?
Currently, government officials do not have a duty of confidentiality to Congress, and therefore are not liable for insider trading. Because of this, Members and government employees can use government information which only THEY have access to when making investment decisions.
A 2004 report from Georgia State University showed that United States Senators received annual investment returns that were approximately 25% higher than what typical Americans were able to achieve. No shock to me… being able to trade with inside knowledge would be a virtually risk-less way to bag HUGE profits…if it weren’t illegal. Similarly, there is currently nothing to stop Congressional staffers and executive branch employees from sharing inside information with their friends. Armed with information not available to the general public, these people are able to make lucrative investment decisions that can either make them a windfall profit, or save them from a devastating loss.
“Political intelligence” firms have created a multi-million dollar industry to traffic this information. Since they first showed up in the 1970s, these firms have operated in secret, and largely without government controls. They provide investors with inside information about impending legislative action that can be used to inform investment decisions. One recent questionable example of these firms’ influence appeared in late 2005:
On November 15, 2005, the stock of a building materials company in Chicago, USG Corp, suddenly doubled, despite the fact that there was no publicly available news about the company, or it’s industry, which would explain the increase in volume and stock price. What the public didn’t know yet, but what some investors discovered through back channels and political intelligence companies, was that then-Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist had quietly decided to move forward with legislation to relieve companies, such as USG Corp, of their liabilities in asbestos related lawsuits.
Treasury Secretary Geithner is now pushing for a HUGE expansion of governmental control over ALL types of companies. Do you think the government might run across any non-public info while policing them? Hell yes, they will.
Currently languishing before Barney Frank’s Banking and Finance committee is H.R. 682, the “Stop Trading On Congressional Knowledge Act.” It was introduced by 3 Democrats: Mr. Baird, Ms. Slaughter and Mr. Walz. It is short, very straightforward, and seeks to prohibit “insider trading” practices by government officials and their cronies.
I may not line up with these Representatives on some other matters, but I absolutely applaud this proposed legislation. It was attempted by Rep. Baird once before, only to die in committee. I have contacted the three sponsors of H.R. 682, and I look forward to reporting what I learn from them.
This kind of prohibition and transparency is right in line with Obama’s campaign promises, should he decide to keep one. It’s truly a bi-partisan issue. It’s patently unfair and downright dirty for Congress to be allowed to line their pockets doing something that would land the rest of us in PRISON.
This issue and this bill have had virtually ZERO attention from the press. When I discovered it while doing other research, I kept telling myself that surely there was something I was missing- that Congress COULDN’T be exempt from such basic, fundamental securities laws. Well, I wasn’t missing anything, and I’m furious about it. I hope you are too.
Contact your Representatives and demand that they vigorously support H.R. 682. Whether Democrat or Republican, these hypocrites are playing us for fools. This should be a pitchfork moment.
Related Posts on Right Soup:
- Fraud In The Bailouts? You Don’t Say.
- Goldman Sachs And The Naked-Short Swindle
- The “Stop Trading On Congressional Knowledge Act”: H.R. 682
- Brit Comedian Eddie Izzard Blurts Out His Illegal Campaign Contribution To Obama
- Porkulus Trading
- Slaughtered.
- Michele Bachmann Calls For Investigation Of Obama Judicial Appointment
- Right Sightings
- Michael Savage: Turn Tea Party Into “Impeach Obama” Party
- John Brennan Panders To “Flying Imam” Ringleader
- Why Underwater Loans Are NOT Being Negotiated
- Right Sightings
- National Tea Party Convention: Breitbart Spanks The Media!
- Too Late To Apologize: A Declaration
- It’s Not Civil To Question Obama’s Citizenship












March 29th, 2009 at 7:00 pm
It makes more sense to eliminate the “crime” of insider trading altogether. People are *supposed* to invest in things which they believe will be profitable. They are *supposed* to refuse to invest in things which they do *not* expect to be profitable. The fact that some people are well placed to do this means that they *should* do it more, not less.
There is nothing wrong with putting your money where it will do the most good. That’s what capitalism is.
March 29th, 2009 at 7:53 pm
Ha! What color is the sky in your world, Rich? The first time it’s legal that a public company’s top management dumps- or much more lucratively, dumps and shorts the crap out of it’s own stock, because the company’s announcing in 2 days that it’s going tits up, will be the beginning of a quick end to public investment in the capital markets. Perhaps in a perfect world, all knowledge would be available about all things, to all people, all the time. But this ain’t that world. In the meantime, while we’re waiting for Nirvana, it is not okay for Congress to be able to trade on insider information. Period.
March 30th, 2009 at 6:36 pm
Government of the people, not above the people. I put in the message to my Rep. I hope everyone else is doing it too.
March 30th, 2009 at 7:13 pm
Senators making huge profits due to early access to information is OK – as long as everybody else is allowed to gain this access, too. This “crime” should not be a crime.
March 31st, 2009 at 8:01 am
The securities laws against insider trading are there to try and level the playing field as much as possible for everyone. Company managements and employees are under extremely strict regs regarding their trades in their own stocks. Most of it is restricted stock (Rule 144) which takes a lengthy process to be approved for sale, only a fraction of someone’s holdings will be approved for sale, and all insider sales and purchases must be publicly reported. The regs for the insiders themselves are huge, the regs for congress are nil. This is why there should be outrage over congress being the only group in America not subject to these regs. I don’t know how you can design a mechanism to lift all restrictions on insider trading- as I said before, it is impossible for everyone to know everything instantly. The regs are the only way to level the playing field for investors. If it were possible for all info to instantly be known by everyone at the same time, than perhaps there shouldn’t be insider trading prohibitions. In the meantime, Congress certainly should be subject to the laws the rest of us are, and not have such an incredible advantage in the securities markets.