Geithner Update: Pocketed Tax Reimbursements On Taxes He Didn’t Pay
Email This Post
It just keeps getting better. Tim Geithner’s appointment to Treasury Secretary hit a major roadblock on Tuesday when it was revealed that he failed to pay $34,000 in taxes from 2001 to 2004. Now we’ve learned that not only did Geithner not pay those taxes despite signing certifications swearing that he had paid them, but also pocketed the “gross up” tax reimbursement provided by his employer which was intended to offset those taxes:
The tax allowance has turned out to be a key part of the Geithner situation. This is how it worked. IMF employees were expected to pay their taxes out of their own money. But the IMF then gave them an extra allowance, known as a “gross-up,” to cover those tax payments. This was done in the Annual Tax Allowance Request, in which the employee filled out some basic information — marital status, dependent children, etc. — and the IMF then estimated the amount of taxes the employee would owe and gave the employee a corresponding allowance.
At the end of the tax allowance form were the words, “I hereby certify that all the information contained herein is true to the best of my knowledge and belief and that I will pay the taxes for which I have received tax allowance payments from the Fund.” Geithner signed the form. He accepted the allowance payment. He didn’t pay the tax. For several years in a row.
According to an analysis released by the Senate Finance Committee, Geithner “wrote contemporaneous checks to the IRS and the State of Maryland for estimated [income] tax payments” that jibed exactly with his IMF statements. But he didn’t write checks for the self-employment tax allowance. Then, according to the committee analysis, “he filled out, signed and submitted an annual tax allowance request worksheet with the IMF that states, ‘I wish to apply for tax allowance of U.S. Federal and State income taxes and the difference between the “self-employed” and “employed” obligation of the U.S. Social Security tax which I will pay on my Fund income.”
In a conversation today with sources on Capitol Hill who are familiar with the situation, I asked, “Was Geithner made whole for tax payments that he didn’t make?”
“Yes,” one source answered. “He was getting the money. He was being paid a tax allowance to pay him for tax payments that he should have made but had not.”
Most. Corrupt. President-Elect. Cabinet. Ever.
Source: National Review via Michelle Malkin
Related Posts on Right Soup:
- New Jersey Bill To Require Finance 101 In High Schools
- Geithner On The Hot Seat For Employing Illegal Housekeeper & Fudging His Own Taxes
- Ron Kirk, Obama’s US Trade Rep Nominee, Owes Back Taxes
- Timothy Geithner: A Simple Mistake?
- Obama Plans To Eliminate Bush Tax Cuts
- National Tea Party Convention: Breitbart Spanks The Media!
- Too Late To Apologize: A Declaration
- It’s Not Civil To Question Obama’s Citizenship
- Will Somebody Tell Barbara Boxer How Congress Works?
- Right Sightings
- FED Gave Banks Access To 23.7 TRILLION DOLLARS NOT $700 Billion!
- Obama Bows Again: To A MAYOR
- Rush To Obama: “Let Me Be The Father You Never Had”
- Americans Sign Petition To Repeal The First Amendment.
- An Old Tale With A Modern Twist
4 Responses to “Geithner Update: Pocketed Tax Reimbursements On Taxes He Didn’t Pay”
Leave a Reply
Pingbacks & Trackbacks:
-
New Jersey Bill To Require Finance 101 In High Schools | Right Soup
January 27th, 2009 at 9:08 am[...] wonder if there is an extra desk for Timothy “I owe taxes on income? That’s crazy!” Geithner. Share this Right Soup with [...]
-
Another Day, Another Obama Cabinet Tax Cheat | Right Soup
January 31st, 2009 at 12:01 am[...] lobbyists (which he previously banned and then unbanned), and now another tax cheat to keep Obama’s first tax cheat [...]












January 15th, 2009 at 2:33 pm
This guy beats all I’ve ever seen. Not only is he corrupt, he’s an idiot. Pocketing his tax allowance, taking childcare deductions for overnight camps…who knows what else? Didn’t he realize all of this would come out? And I wonder how the “allowance” granted to IMF employees manages to escape being taxable income? Or does it?!
February 4th, 2010 at 9:28 am
Kudos from one braniac to another.